Helm › Helm University › Track 7 › Lesson 7.4
Lesson 7.4Appeals exist for reviews that break the rules, not for reviews you disagree with. Here is the difference, and what happens either way.
Prefer to listen? This is the same lesson, word for word. The text below is the transcript.
This lesson prepares you to: Raise an appeal, and know the grounds that are and are not accepted.
An appeal asks a Helm admin to look at a review that breaks the rules. It is not a request to remove a rating you think is unfair. Those are different things and mixing them up is why most appeals fail.
You get one open appeal per review, so the same row cannot be appealed repeatedly. Make it count.
| Outcome | What it means |
|---|---|
| Appeal granted | The review broke the rules. It is hidden or removed and stops counting. |
| Appeal upheld | The review stands. It did not break a rule. |
Both outcomes are recorded. Which brings us to the reason any of this is worth believing.
Whichever way an appeal goes, the decision writes a row to the moderation audit log, in the same database transaction as the change itself. An appeal that quietly went nowhere is not a thing that can happen. Lesson 7.5 explains why that matters more than it sounds.
Next: the one promise about reviews that Helm can actually prove.